Crisis and Controversy
Posted by Chris on May 11, 2008 under Sermons
any of the images, graphics, or charts on this page. |
Growth 1906-1946
- 1906 – 159,658
- 1916 – 317,937
- 1926 – 435,714
- 1936 – 309,551
- 1946 – 682,172
Aftermath of 1906
- Debate
- – Controversy was the only way to reach consensus without creeds or conventions
- Dissension
- – Congregational division over various issues was common before 1930’s
- Disempowerment
- – Afraid to do anything for fear of doing something wrong
Trivia or Truth?
- Baptistery or Running River?
- A plate for the bread or not?
- Extend an invitation or wait for the question?
- Elders or no elders?
- Any song or just those addresses to the Lord?
The Sunday School Issue
- Opposition to Sunday Schools
- – Unauthorized [silence of Scripture]
– Biblical pattern instructed parents to teach children - 1925 – Directory of Non-Class churches assembled
- The Apostolic Way listed the faithful preachers and churches.
The Cup Question
- In the 1920’s multiple containers for the communion became common
- At issue was the pattern of the Lord’s Supper prescribed in Scripture
- – Multiple cups were unauthorized
– The one cup was an element of the communion pattern - The faithful were listed in the Old Paths Advocate.
Millennial Controversy
- R. H. Boll – 1915 Gospel Advocate articles
- Believed the prophetic sections of Scripture should be examined
- Was told to quit writing. He then started a new journal, Word and Work.
- H. Leo Boles, Pres. Nashville Bible School
- 1927 Boll-Boles debate in Gospel Advocate (May-November)
- After debate Boles invited Boll to speak at NBS Chapel service
- 1933 Neal-Wallace debate; Wallace suggested the issue threatened fellowship.
- Wallace not only condemned Boll, but also those he considered sympathetic with Boll.
- Criticism of Wallace’s crusade
- J. N. Armstrong:
- – Premillennialism was a personal conviction
– Minority view should be treated graciously
Dynamics of Division
- Focus on observable practice.
- List of “the faithful”
- No fellowship with error
- Methodology more important that theology
- One side opposes divergence from the pattern, the other is indifferent.
- – Silence of Scripture